| This is a
WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=191177
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 DOCTOR'S ORDERS WorldNetDaily Exclusive It's begun: Obamacare shutters pain treatment Look what president's solution is doing to U.S. health centers Posted: August 16, 2010 9:13 pm Eastern
By Bob
Unruh
Obamacare has landed in Denver, where doctors at a pain-management
clinic have been told they must stop treating patients with a successful
process that extracts their own adult stem cells, cultivates them and then
reinjects them to stimulate growth in damaged limbs. The word of the dispute comes from Dr. Christopher Centeno of the Centeno Schultz clinic, whose Regenexx, or Regenerative Sciences
Inc., has been successfully treating patients with the process for several
years. Centeno confirms his work provides a much less costly and significantly
more convenient alternative to knee or hip joint replacement surgeries,
which sometimes require a year or more of recuperation. But the Food and Drug Administration, in the wake of the adoption of
President Obama's plan to nationalize health-care decision making, has
ordered the company to halt, because the federal agency views the process
as making "drugs." (Story continues below) The FDA announced Aug. 6 that it wanted an injunction in federal court
against the company, alleging "violations of current good manufacturing
practice." "Regenerative Sciences' cultured cell product is not approved by the
FDA, and no adequate and well-controlled studies have been done to
demonstrate its safety or effectiveness for any indication," the federal
agency announced. Karen Midthun, acting director for the FDA's Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, said in the announcement, "FDA recognizes the
importance of the development of novel and promising new therapies.
However, when companies like Regenerative Sciences fail to comply with FDA
laws and regulations, they put the public's health at risk." An FDA spokeswoman provided the announcement to WND but did not
elaborate. The agency, in a 2008 letter to the company, said, "In order to
introduce or deliver for introduction a drug that is also a biological
product into interstate commerce, a valid biologics license must be in
effect. Such licenses are issued only after a showing of safety and
efficacy for the product's intended use. While in the development stage,
such products may be distributed for clinical use in humans only if the
sponsor has an investigational new drug application in effect as specified
by FDA regulations. … The mesenchymal stem cells utilized in your
Regenexx™ procedure are not the subject of an approved biologics license
application (BLA) nor is there an investigational new drug application
(IND) in effect. Therefore, your implantation of the mesenchymal stem
cells for which a valid license or IND is not in effect appears to violate
the Act and the PHS Act and may result in FDA seeking relief as provided
by law." Centeno told WND that despite the company's repeated efforts to obtain
a resolution in the disagreement, the FDA continually declined to respond
– until Obamacare was adopted. Now the federal agency has moved to "enjoin" the company's operations,
and Centeno told WND his company will fight. "I think what we're seeing is a massive federalist move here," he told
WND. "I think this represents that [for] Obamacare to work there has to be
strict federal control over medicine." A video has been posted in which Centeno describes his work:
He said that until now, medicine has been provided by doctors and
regulated at the state level. "That's not going to work under Obamacare," he said. "The government is
trying to get more and more positive control over what your doctor does or
doesn't do." Centeno said the process he uses doesn't create a drug, as the FDA
claims. It's not more complicated than the "blood-doping" process that
athletes sometimes in the past have attempted to improve their
performance. And under the guidance offered by the FDA, a doctor who treats knee
pain with a steroid and a painkiller should go through the process of
acknowledging he or she is making a "drug" because of the combination of
medications, he suggested. In fact, labs that do in vitro fertilization "do pretty much identical
to what we were doing in our lab." This, he said, is what "all physicians, regardless of what they do, can
expect if the FDA has authority over the practice of medicine." "This is opening a Pandora's box that will never be closed," he warned.
"It means that some bureaucrat sitting in Maryland has the ability to tell
the doctor what he can and can't do to you. "The FDA action here clearly is an infringement of states' rights; it
infringes on the doctor-patient relationship. In order to make Obamacare
work, there's going to have to be a lot of infringement. They cannot
control costs without it," he said. Centeno explained the process his clinic has used: Stem cells are
extracted from the back of the hip, they are isolated in the lab and
cultivated to obtain a bigger number. They then are injected into the knee
as an alternative for knee replacement surgery. The doctor said only 4 percent of his patients end up eventually having
knee replacement surgery after his treatments, leaving more than nine of
10 able to avoid the surgical costs, hospitalization costs and dangers,
rehabilitation time and costs and pain of a joint replacement. "Many of our patients are self-employed," Centeno said. "They just
cannot afford a knee replacement and to take three to six months off
work." The company also points out that stem cells from the body can be
regenerated and reinjected to treat heart disease, COPD and other auto
immune diseases. He said that he's looking forward to getting the case into court. "The FDA will finally answer our questions, in court, about their
claims and jurisdiction as opposed to doing everything in their power to
avoid the issue that we are not a drug manufacturer, but simply a medical
practice," he said. The clinic has been using its patients' stem cells to treat orthopedic
conditions since 2005 and first got a letter from the FDA in 2008 claiming
its medical procedure was creating a new biologic drug. The FDA inspected
Regenerative Science's facility in 2009 and found, at that time, it was
not compliant with drug mass manufacture guidelines but failed to take any
action. In the meantime, Regenerative Sciences had filed several lawsuits
against the FDA to resolve the issue. It most recently has sought a
temporary restraining order demanding the agency take "final" action or
leave the medical clinic alone. Adult stem cells are found throughout a patient's body. Medical studies
increasingly are indicating they have as much – or more – clinical promise
than the controversial embryonic stem cells, which are derived from
embryos that must be destroyed in the process. Yet the Obama administration has been on a headlong pursuit to fund
research using embryonic cells, while cracking down through the FDA on
adult stem cell processes that work, he noted. Customers, however, are thoroughly behind Centeno's work. "I want the whole world – especially seniors – to know that injuries
such as femoral, hip and pelvic fractures don't have to diminish your
quality of life," wrote patient "J.A." on behalf of the company. "You can
be healthy and moving forward again with this procedure." While a long list of lawsuits are pending against Obamacare, most
challenging its underlying constitutionality and seeking to cancel the
entire concept, WND also has reported that more than three-quarters
of the needed members of the U.S. House of Representatives have signed
on to a measure to have a new vote on Obamacare that essentially would
allow the chamber to withdraw its approval of the law and begin the
process of banishing it. The plan is a discharge
petition offered by Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, which is being supported
by a petition drive that urges
members of Congress to repeal Obamacare because of numerous problems. Under the provisions of the discharge procedures in the House, such a
move is required to have the support of 218 members, a majority, of the
435-member chamber before moving forward. But since it requires a majority, it is virtually assured of approval.
The proposal states: "Pursuant to clause 2 of rule XV, I, Steve King of
Iowa, move to discharge the Committees on Energy and Commerce, Ways and
Means, Education and Labor, the Judiciary, Natural Resources, Rules, House
Administration and Appropriations from the consideration of the bill (H.R.
4972) to repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which was
referred to said committees on March 25, 2010, in support of which motion
the undersigned Members of the House of Representatives affix their
signatures." Its target is the $940 billion, or greater, bill adopted by the
Democrat-controlled Congress in March. Advocates say constituents need to call their representatives to tell
them to get on board right away so that the petition is positioned to move
forward whether or not the GOP becomes the majority in the House after the
2010 fall elections. Sign the petition opposing
Obamacare. Special offers: Summer
sizzle: Obamacare could be repealed before election Get "Taking
America Back," Joseph Farah's manifesto for sovereignty, self-reliance and
moral renewal Related stories: 33,500
voices to U.S. House: Pull plug on Obamacare! Obamacare
reversal? House 75% of the way there! Obamacare
repeal? 150 House signatures already 8
more in Congress sign on for Obamacare repeal Demand
for revote on Obamacare surges U.S.
House plan overturning Obamacare halfway there Report:
Failing grade for Obamacare 'Flawed'
Obamacare called 'unconstitutional' Was
Obamacare designed for 'distribution of wealth'? Obamacare
hospitals killed: 60, with 200 on life support Uncovered:
Obama's mystery college years L.A.
Times smears exposé outing president Obama
can't shake 'Manchurian President' pursuit Did
Obama hide damning health-care report? Government
health care a 4-letter word: W-a-i-t Health-care
mandates could be 'null and void' Microchips
in Obamacare? Not yet Injunction
sought to halt Obamacare Does
your faith free you from forced Obamacare? Did you
feel that hit in your wallet? Obama
ridicules health-care law critics Citizens
sue feds to block Obamacare Federal
health care? Not so fast, say states Bloody
Sunday, 2010: House OKs health bill America
denounces 'Obamacare' threat President:
Obamacare deals 'privileged' 'Don't
count on courts to uphold Constitution' Anger
at Washington reaches full throttle Health-care
'trickery' called overthrow of Constitution Levin:
We will sue over health-care trick Code
Red! Americans fight to crush Obamacare 'Backroom
deals' details wanted, now! Washington
firebrand: 'Health care' is 'fraud' New
promise: Lawsuits to challenge 'Obamacare' Obama
sued for secret abortion meetings Author
exposes 'seedy underbelly of Washington' Corruption
fighter: 'I've never seen it like this' Judicial
Watch founder flays Washington Hollywood:
Withhold sex to push health reform Jessica
Alba's seduce-the-vote campaign Half
of voters oppose Congress members on health care Union
members oppose key Obamacare points |