| This is a
WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=142297
Wednesday, December 08, 2010 PLAY IT AGAIN, SAM Preying on the National Day of Prayer Exclusive: Chuck Norris explains why time-honored tradition embraces 1st Amendment Posted: April 19, 2010 1:00 am Eastern
By Chuck
Norris
Proof that progressivism is alive and well on planet earth came again
last week via the Wisconsin
federal judge's ruling that the National Day of Prayer is
unconstitutional. Appointed to the bench by Jimmy Carter, U.S. District Judge Barbara B.
Crabb wrote that the government can no more enact laws supporting a day of
prayer than it can encourage citizens to fast during Ramadan, attend a
synagogue or practice magic. She
further gave the rationale, "The same law that prohibits the
government from declaring a National Day of Prayer also prohibits it from
declaring a National Day of Blasphemy." Even more preposterous logic is found in her
words: "In fact, it is because the nature of prayer is so personal and
can have such a powerful effect on a community that the government may not
use its authority to try to influence an individual's decision whether and
when to pray." As most know, the first Thursday in May has been honored as a National
Day of Prayer since 1952, when its approval flew through the Congress as a
way to help separate America as a country with a Godly heritage and to aid
her success against atheistic communism. Ever since, presidents have
commemorated the day. Even President Obama issued a proclamation in 2009
about the National Day of Prayer, though he did not hold ecumenical and
public events with religious leaders as former President George W. Bush
had done. Regarding Judge Crabb's ruling on the National Day of Prayer being
unconstitutional, Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law and
Justice Jay Sekulow hit the judicial nail on the head when he said, "It is
unfortunate that this court failed to understand that a day set aside for
prayer for the country represents a time-honored tradition that embraces
the First Amendment, not violates it." Though this ruling is only one, these skewed judgments permeate nearly
every stratum of our society. And they often hinge upon erroneous and
ignorant views of America's Judeo-Christian heritage, and especially the
First Amendment and the so-called separation of church and state. Liberals would have you believe that the First Amendment establishes an
impenetrable and impassable "separation of church and state." But that
phrase appears nowhere in the First Amendment, which actually reads:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,
or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to
petition the government for a redress of grievances." The phrase "the separation of Church and State" actually comes from a
letter Thomas Jefferson wrote in 1802 to the Danbury Baptists. He told
them that no particular Christian denomination was going to have a
monopoly in government. His words, "a wall of separation between Church
and State," were not written to remove all religious practice from
government or civic settings, but to prohibit the domination and even
legislation of religious sectarianism. The Danbury Baptists had written to Thomas Jefferson seeking
reassurance that their religious liberty would be guaranteed, not that
religious expression on public grounds would be banned. Proof that
Jefferson was not trying to rid government of religious (specifically
Christian) influence comes from the fact he endorsed using government
buildings for church meetings, signed a treaty with the Kaskaskia Indians
that allotted federal money to support the building of a Catholic church
and to pay the salary of the church's priests and repeatedly renewed
legislation that gave land to the United Brethren to help their missionary
activities among the Indians. (Column continues below) Some might be completely surprised to discover that just two days after
Jefferson wrote his famous letter citing the "wall of separation between
Church and State," he attended church in the place where he always had as
president: the U.S. Capitol. The very seat of our nation's government was
used for sacred purposes. As the Library of Congress notes, "It is no
exaggeration to say that on Sundays in Washington during the
administrations of Thomas Jefferson (1801-1809) and of James Madison
(1809-1817) the state became the church." Does that sound like someone who
was trying to create an impenetrable wall of separation between church and
state? If all the things the American Civil Liberties Union and other
progressive groups said about the First Amendment were true, Jefferson
would flunk their religious-state separation test. Progressives don't want
Americans to know that for the founders, Judeo-Christian belief and
practice and government administration and policy were not separated at
all. Denominational tests for public office were prohibited, but the idea
that Judeo-Christian ideas and practices had to be kept separate from
government would have struck them as ridiculous because the very basis for
the founders' ideas were rights that were endowed upon all of us by our
Creator. The ACLU and like-minded groups are not preserving First Amendment
rights. They are perverting the meaning of the Establishment Clause (which
was to prevent the creation of a national church like the Church of
England) to deny the Free Exercise Clause (which preserves our rights to
worship as we want, privately and publicly). Both clauses were intended to
safeguard religious liberty, not to circumscribe its practice. The framers
were seeking to guarantee freedom of religion, not freedom
from religion. Critics try to oppose the National Day of Prayer's constitutionality by
saying it didn't exist prior to 1952 as a national observance. But all one
must do is go back to the framers of the Constitution to understand that,
whether one looks at Creator-language in such pivotal documents as the
Declaration of Independence or the role religion played in establishing
ethics and morality even in political arenas, not one justice or
government official back then would have agreed with the ruling of
Wisconsin Judge Barbara Crabb. In 1789, after being urged by Congress on the same day they finished
drafting the First Amendment, President Washington issued a Thanksgiving
proclamation stating, "It is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the
providence of Almighty God, to obey His will, to be grateful for His
benefits, and humbly to implore His protection and favor." President John Adams declared that America's independence "ought to be
commemorated, as the Day of Deliverance, by solemn acts of devotion to God
Almighty." Ben Franklin was particularly eloquent on the power of prayer in
government, as he addressed those who attended the Constitutional
Convention: It's a question that needs to ring from the corridors of Congress to
the halls of our public schools and homes: "And have we now forgotten that
powerful friend?" To answer for yourself and your household, take a minute right now to
sign the official
National Day of Prayer petition. As the Protect Prayer website says, "U.S. District Judge Barbara B.
Crabb needs a history lesson, and we need to send a message to Congress:
'It's time that we put a stop to renegade judges who rule with no
understanding of our nation's history. Our Founding Fathers declared
National Days of Prayer to be constitutional, and so should you!'" Most of all, join a group in your local community on this 59th National Day of Prayer on May
6, bow your head in prayer with them, beseech God to forgive and heal
our land and demonstrate in action your First Amendment rights! (See Chuck Norris' brand-new video Patriot Service Announcement
about fighting government tyranny at YouTube or BlackBeltPatriotism.com.) |