| This is a
WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=122689
Thursday, December 15, 2011 WorldNetDaily Exclusive States' rights rebellion over National Guard Lawmakers fight to keep governors, not president, in control of troops Posted: January 26, 2010 9:17 pm Eastern
By Bob
Unruh
Responding to an executive order by President Obama, a new push is
under way for states to adopt laws limiting the use of their National
Guard units unless there is an invasion, insurrection or other limited
circumstance. As WND
reported, Obama's order establishes a new "Council of Governors"
designated to advise on the "synchronization and integration of state and
federal military activities in the United States." The recent order, posted on the White
House website, was accompanied by the explanation that the group is to
work "to protect our nation against all types of hazards." It comes just
weeks after the president issued a similarly obscure order vastly
expanding INTERPOL's privileges in the U.S. The White House said the new council is to include governors and
administration officials to review "such matters as involving the National
Guard of the various states; homeland defense, civil support;
synchronization and integration of state and federal military activities
in the United States; and other matters of mutual interest pertaining to
National Guard, homeland defense, and civil support activities." However, there was no definition of the group's authority. Can the
council recommend "military activities" and can the governors, who already
are in command of their own state guard units, mandate activities outside
of their areas of jurisdiction? The White House did not respond to WND
questions on the issue. (Story continues below) Now
the Tenth Amendment Center is recommending a model legislation that
states can use to limit the activities of their own National Guard
members. The model legislation states: "The governor shall withhold or withdraw
approval of the transfer of the National Guard to federal control in the
absence of: a) A military invasion of the United States, or b) An
insurrection, or c) A calling forth of the guard by the federal government
in a manner provided for by Congress to execute the laws of the union,
provided that said laws were made in pursuance of the delegated powers in
the Constitution of the United States, or d) A formal declaration of war
from Congress." The organization said the requests to state legislatures already have
begun with a letter on the issue dispatched by Walt Garlington, founder of
the Louisiana State Sovereignty Committee, to state Rep. Brett F. Geymann.
"I ask you to once again take up the cause of states' rights and
protect Louisiana from this latest unconstitutional action coming from
Washington, D.C.," the letter said. "Please introduce a bill reasserting
the governor's power over Louisiana's National Guard to counteract the EO
issued by Pres. Obama." The model legislation proposed by the Tenth Amendment Center says the
law is, "For the purpose of requiring the governor to withhold or withdraw
approval of the transfer of this state's National Guard to federal control
in the absence of an explicit authorization adopted by the federal
government in pursuance of the powers delegated to the federal government
in Article I, Section 8, Clause 15 of the U.S. Constitution." It cites U.S. Constitution provisions that Congress has the power to
provide for "calling forth the militia" to "execute the laws of the
union," or to suppress insurrections or repel invasions. The proposal cites Daniel Webster's statement in 1814 to Congress, "It
will be the solemn duty of the state governments to protect their own
authority over their own militia, and to interpose between their citizens
and arbitrary power. These are among the objects for which the state
governments exist." The White House said the new
panel was called for in the Fiscal Year 2008 National Defense
Authorization Act and will include 10 governors picked by the president as
well as the Coast Guard commandant and other officials from the Department
of Homeland Security and other agencies. The White House announcement said the council "will provide an
invaluable senior administration forum for exchanging views with state and
local officials on strengthening our national resilience and the homeland
defense and civil support challenges facing our nation today and in the
future." Los Angeles Times blogger Andrew Malcolm poked
fun at the announcement, writing Obama "has determined that, a)
there is an insufficient number of advisory bodies among the gazillion
already in existence for the federal government in general and said
president and his White House specifically." Obama also, Malcolm said, "chooses to ignore the existence of the
National Governors Assn., the Republican Governors Assn., the Democratic
Governors Assn. and the secure telephones within arms-reach of virtually
everywhere said president chooses to sit and/or recline." Ultimately, he said, Obama has decided, "One more meaningless advisory
body probably couldn't hurt anything, and might actually look good." At Canada
Free Press, commentary writer Judi McLeod said, "Like the 30-plus
czars running America with neither the people's nor the Congress's
blessings, the Council of Governors is already a done deal." Blogger
Nicholas Contompasis suggested it was the "first step towards martial
law in America" because it sets up the "use of federal troops and the
combination of state and federal agencies under the Defense Department."
Participants on his forum page said the order appears to be in defiance
of posse comitatus, which restricts U.S. military action within the United
States. One contributor noted the order talks about "hazards" but then
addresses only military hazards. "The very notion of the executive branch (good intentions or not)
issuing executive orders/presidential directives that apply to anything or
anyone not specifically within the executive branch is tyrannical," the
forum participant said. Related offers: Hope of
the Wicked: Master Plan to Rule the World (book) Trading
Away Our Future (Book) The True
Story of the Bilderberg Group (Book) The Beast
on the East River (book) Previous stories: New
council to advise on 'military activities' in U.S. |